The foundation for the client-lawyer relationship is the (reciprocal) relationship of trust. The defense of office in the criminal process deserves, of course, the defense of the office .
Assignment to the lawyer by the client
The contract (even an oral agreement) between the lawyer and the assisted party falls within the category of intellectual work contracts, referred to in articles 2222 and following of the civil code, following which the professional undertakes to perform the work (not to obtain the result!) and the customer undertakes to pay the relative remuneration (see in- depth information on legal costs ).
- The particularity of the relationship between client and lawyer consists in the fact that the client rarely possesses technical-juridical knowledge, nor is he able to have full awareness of the choices that can be taken and the related consequences.
- This is why the relationship of trust with the lawyer is even more important than with other professional figures: the burden of choosing a professionally valid defender rests with the customer. This is why you can put your trust over the Sydney criminal defense law firms.
The verification of competence
The relationship of trust must be verified in the specific case: if one of the most widespread ways of choosing a lawyer is word of mouth , it is worth checking – talking to acquaintances, but also by searching on Google, for example, or by consulting the Curriculum Vitae or the list of publications on the website. If the lawyer chosen ” by hearsay ” is competent for the requested subject.
The Best Details
How would you not go to a gynecologist to treat a cavity (even though you are a gynecologist and a dentist, both of whom have a degree in medicine), so going to a “civil lawyer” (a lawyer who mainly or exclusively sponsors civil cases) to be defended in a criminal trial is very risky and therefore inadvisable; secularly, a ” criminal lawyer ” (a lawyer who mainly or exclusively sponsors criminal cases) rarely has the necessary preparation to follow a civil procedure. This is the reason why many studios bring together several professionals with different skills.
In Sydney, however, the specializations are not (unfortunately) still binding, and that is, the lawyer can autonomously decide to defend in all branches of law: therefore a rigorous verification by the client is worthwhile, even (but not only) by addressing the issue of competence with the lawyer during the first interview.
It should be noted that the inexperience and errors of the lawyer cannot constitute a reason to overturn an unfavorable decision, the option has always maintained that ” the burden of choosing a professionally valid defender rests with the defendant and that he monitors the exact observance of the mandate conferred.